image
Home About Energy Broadband PC's Education Local Equip Health Govt. Legal Politics Financial -Future-
-Warming- -Oil- -Gas- -Propane- -Electrical- -S-Grid- -Nuclear- -Coal- -Solar- -Wind- -REA's- -DMEA- -Home-
WSRL.ORG / Rural Colorado Energy Issues - July. 2005 - Revised July 2010 - Page 1
Note - Ethanol Scam is on Page 2. Oil is of strategic importance to the U.S. for many reasons. As with global warming, many feel there is an inexhaustible supply of world oil that only needs to be discovered and then developed.
image
Dr. Hubbert - Father Of Peak Oil
Others feel we are at or have passed peak oil production to be followed by ever rapid declines in supply. Still others feel that the vast world appetite for oil can be met with biofuel technologies. With so very much at stake, one would think some central authority would have a firm grip on the reality of the situation. Unfortunately, in our current political climate, there is no unified consensus regarding availability of supply or what the future holds. Then there is the question of global warming. Even with the availability of large supplies of oil, there is an increasing question as to how much can be safely consumed without destroying the planet with greenhouse gases.
Peak Oil -
Dr. Hubbert, now deceased, is known for accurately predicting the oil production peak for the U.S. The techniques he used for his estimations have, of course, been used to predict production peaks in other parts of the world and for other commodities. Because of the large sums of money oil reserves represent, most countries are very secretive about the amount of oil remaining in their countries. The end result is a very high stakes game of estimating how much oil the planet really has left.
Energy In vs. Energy Out
For rural dwellers there are currently few alternatives to oil for transportation or crop production. Smoke and mirrors solutions add to the belief that solutions to the oil crisis are just around the corner. The production of ethanol from corn may be just such an example.
image
Barstow, CA - 6/2008
The belief that oil shale will ride to the rescue of the U.S. is looking like another such myth. All of the processes above have what is called an "Energy Production Ratio" or EPR. In the middle east, you can use one unit of energy to drill an oil well and you will likely get 100 or more units of energy back from that well. If you produce bio-diesel in this country, for example, from soy or corn, the best you can expect back is three units of energy for every unit of energy you put into the process. World daily oil consumption is 80+ million barrels, the U.S. consumes 20+ million barrels daily but produces only 7.6 million barrels (source = CIA). With an EPR of only three, how much total energy is now required to replace 12.5 million barrels of imported oil? The next question is, how much land and water does it take to produce in the neighborhood of 12.5 million barrels (net - 16.7 million gross) of oil per day?
U.S. Consumption -
As stupid as this sounds, the vast majority of U.S. infrastructure is built around the consumption of petroleum. The percentage of available world oil consumed by the U.S. can be found on the Nation Master website. Only 7 to 8% of world oil is produced domestically in the U.S. The remainder needs to be imported at great cost. Besides the huge economic penalties currently being imposed on the U.S. by imported foreign oil, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what would happen if a major percentage of imported foreign oil stops flowing.
What are some major energy consumers?
Automobile - 25-50 Gross ton miles per gallon (highest - worst)
Airliner - 60-65 Gross ton miles per gallon
Passenger Bus - 110-120 Gross ton miles per gallon
18 Wheel Truck - 120-200 Gross ton miles per gallon
Train - 750 Gross ton miles per gallon (lowest - best)
From www.oilcrisis.com - It should be noted that trains in many countries are electrically powered and use no petroleum products for fuel. For a more complete listing of fuel efficiency vs. mode of transport, see the ORNL Transportation Energy Data Book.
image
Freight Fuel Efficiencies - Less Is Better

In addition to the data above, the chart to the right shows the fuel efficiencies for the different modes of moving heavy freight. This data does not apply to moving passangers. According to government data, there does not appear to be a great deal of difference in fuel use between the different methods of moving people. The same, however, is not the case for heavy freight. As you can see from the chart, air freight is by far the most inefficient use of fuel. The second most wasteful use of fuel is large trucks. Long haul trucks consume approximately twelve and a half times more fuel per ton-mile as opposed to rail. Currently, rail even beats out marine (barge) transport of heavy freight. Trucks will always be needed for the local distribution of goods but it would be much more fuel efficient if freight, transported over long distances, was moved by rail. As a side note, cars are getting smaller. The combination of small cars and large trucks on Interstate Highways is not a good mix. It would be much safer and fuel efficient if long haul freight was moved by rail rather than Interstate Highway.

Please continue to next page - - Oil -- Gas -- Propane - Ethanol Scam
Copyright WSRL.ORG © 2005 thru 2012
Oil Links
Updated January 2012 line
Ethanol Links
Updated April 2010
line

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Linux Open Source